... a quarterly newsletter published by Global Learning Partners
 
Spring 2006
ISSUE 5

"The energy level
was high throughout,
as was the involvement
of the participants."


Designing for New Members of Parliament

by Ann Blyberg
Executive Director ~ International Human Rights Internship Program
Institute of International Education

In the fall, I designed a learning program on a Human Rights Perspective to Budgeting for new Members of Parliament in Sudan. The group, already starting around 30 people, expanded by “popular demand” to 45-50 (44 stayed the full three days). The program design used a Dialogue Education Approach. I faced the problem you raise—how do you do Dialogue Education in a larger group? I focused a lot on small group work, of course, and I tried to limit sharing with the whole group to a few people each time. However, I didn’t do the teaching myself, but involved two other people—neither of whom were trained in Dialogue Education, but both of whom have experienced something akin to this same program before.

The participants were not used to a participatory approach, so it’s difficult to separate out how the results were the effect of that reality, and how much was the size of the group. The two teachers reported being exhausted at the end of each day, trying to keep the program on track (participants had lots of comments, some on the mark, some wandering well off!).

However, I have also been told that the energy level was high throughout, as was the involvement of the participants. This would argue that it can work—although perhaps not as maximally as might be the case with a smaller group. I did not have as many kinesthetic exercises as I might otherwise have had—in part because I knew that would be precedent-setting for most participants, and because having a large group get up and move around a lot could make time-control out of the question! The UN mission in Sudan, which requested the program, did not have the budget to bring in more than two teachers.

That is definitely one recommendation I would make—keep the number of teachers proportional to the size of the group. The larger the number, the more teachers, to make it more possible to break the group up into more workable sizes.

© Global Learning Partners 2005
147 Springhurst Ave | Toronto, ON | M6K 1B9 | 1-877-973-3393 | www.globalearning.com | welcome@globalearning.com